2002 Mazda 6 vs. 1993 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 6 (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1993 Plymouth Colt. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1993 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 6 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1993 Plymouth Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda 6 (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Plymouth Colt. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 6 | 1993 Plymouth Colt | |
Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
Model | 6 | Colt |
Year Released | 2002 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1833 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2530 mm |