2002 Mazda 6 vs. 1993 Rover 200
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 6 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (86 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 6 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1993 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1993 Rover 200 (180 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 6. (167 Nm). This means 1993 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 6 | 1993 Rover 200 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 6 | 200 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 180 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |