2002 Mazda 6 vs. 1994 Rover 100
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 100 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 6 (164 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1994 Rover 100. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 6 weights approximately 620 kg more than 1994 Rover 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda 6 (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 100. (135 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2002 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 100.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 6 | 1994 Rover 100 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 6 | 100 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1380 mm |