2002 Mazda 6 vs. 1994 Rover 100
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 100 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 6 (148 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1994 Rover 100. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 6 weights approximately 541 kg more than 1994 Rover 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda 6 (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 100. (90 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2002 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mazda 6 | 1994 Rover 100 | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | 6 | 100 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1113 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 181 Nm | 90 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 63 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 884 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1380 mm |
