2002 Mazda 6 vs. 1994 TVR Type S
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 TVR Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 TVR Type S would be higher. At 2,931 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 TVR Type S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 6 weights approximately 545 kg more than 1994 TVR Type S.
Because 1994 TVR Type S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 TVR Type S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 6 | 1994 TVR Type S | |
Make | Mazda | TVR |
Model | 6 | Type S |
Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2931 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1130 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2300 mm |