2002 Mazda 6 vs. 2004 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2004 Renault Scenic is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 6 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2004 Renault Scenic. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Scenic weights approximately 279 kg more than 2002 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda 6 (181 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Scenic. (105 Nm). This means 2002 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 6 | 2004 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 6 | Scenic |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 105 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 1704 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 48 L |