2002 Mazda 6 vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 6. (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 6 weights approximately 981 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 6 | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Mazda | Westfield |
Model | 6 | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 444 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2320 mm |