2002 Mazda 6 vs. 2009 Holden Colorado

To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 13 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 6. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 6.

Because 2009 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 6. (181 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 6. 2009 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 2002 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2002 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: