2002 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 6 (164 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (158 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.
Because 2002 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (250 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 6. (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 6 | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | 6 | TT |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |