2002 Mazda 6 vs. 2011 BMW 320

To start off, 2011 BMW 320 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 BMW 320 (182 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 6. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 6.

Because 2011 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 BMW 320 (380 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 6. (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2011 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Mazda 6 2011 BMW 320
Make Mazda BMW
Model 6 320
Year Released 2002 2011
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 1995 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 182 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 181 Nm 380 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 2750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 90 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.1 mm 84 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 4624 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1811 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1384 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2810 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 57 L