2002 Mazda 6 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 6. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 487 kg more than 2002 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Cadillac XTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 6. (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 6. 2013 Cadillac XTS has automatic transmission and 2002 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2002 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac XTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Mazda 6 2013 Cadillac XTS
Make Mazda Cadillac
Model 6 XTS
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 3564 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 314 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 181 Nm 358 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 5200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.1 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 11.5
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front AWD
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1425 kg 1912 kg
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 5131 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1852 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2837 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 76 L