2002 Mazda 626 vs. 1947 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2002 Mazda 626 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,481 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1947 Talbot T 26 (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 626. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1947 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 358 kg more than 2002 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1947 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 626 | 1947 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Mazda | Talbot |
Model | 626 | T 26 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1947 |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 4481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3130 mm |