2002 Mazda 626 vs. 1964 Willys-Overland Aero
To start off, 2002 Mazda 626 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Willys-Overland Aero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Willys-Overland Aero would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Willys-Overland Aero is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Willys-Overland Aero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Willys-Overland Aero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mazda 626 | 1964 Willys-Overland Aero | |
| Make | Mazda | Willys-Overland |
| Model | 626 | Aero |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1840 cc | 2638 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2740 mm |
