2002 Mazda 626 vs. 1970 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2002 Mazda 626 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 626. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 48 kg more than 2002 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 626. (152 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1970 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 626 | 1970 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 626 | Cedric |
Year Released | 2002 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |