2002 Mazda 626 vs. 1976 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2002 Mazda 626 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 626 (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 626 weights approximately 387 kg more than 1976 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mazda 626 | 1976 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Mazda | Zastava |
| Model | 626 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 1840 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2010 mm |
