2002 Mazda 626 vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 626 weights approximately 532 kg more than 2003 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2003 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 626 | 2003 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | 626 | Minica |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2350 mm |