2002 Mazda AZ vs. 1966 Simca 1200S
To start off, 2002 Mazda AZ is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Simca 1200S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Simca 1200S would be higher. At 1,204 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Simca 1200S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Simca 1200S weights approximately 105 kg more than 2002 Mazda AZ.
Because 2002 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Simca 1200S. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mazda AZ | 1966 Simca 1200S | |
| Make | Mazda | Simca |
| Model | AZ | 1200S |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 1204 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2240 mm |
