2002 Mazda AZ vs. 2010 Kia Forte
To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Forte is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Forte weights approximately 547 kg more than 2002 Mazda AZ.
Because 2002 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Kia Forte. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda AZ | 2010 Kia Forte | |
Make | Mazda | Kia |
Model | AZ | Forte |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 173 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1297 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4481 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2649 mm |