2002 Mazda AZ vs. 2013 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-V is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 2,354 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda CR-V weights approximately 749 kg more than 2002 Mazda AZ.
Because 2002 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Honda CR-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2002 Mazda AZ has manual transmission. 2002 Mazda AZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda AZ | 2013 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | AZ | CR-V |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1499 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1644 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2620 mm |