2002 Mazda B2500 vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 2002 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 144 kg more than 2002 Mazda B2500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (450 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda B2500. (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda B2500.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda B2500 | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
Model | B2500 | XJ |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1884 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5127 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2105 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 3032 mm |