2002 Mazda B2500 vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 2002 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 144 kg more than 2002 Mazda B2500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (450 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda B2500. (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda B2500.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Mazda B2500 2013 Jaguar XJ
Make Mazda Jaguar
Model B2500 XJ
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2499 cc 2995 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line W
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 82 HP 335 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 195 Nm 450 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline / Electric Hybrid
Drive Type 4WD AWD
Transmission Type Manual CVT
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1740 kg 1884 kg
Vehicle Length 5010 mm 5127 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 2105 mm
Vehicle Height 1620 mm 1456 mm
Wheelbase Size 2990 mm 3032 mm