2002 Mazda Demio vs. 2011 Holden Caprice

To start off, 2011 Holden Caprice is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda Demio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda Demio would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 282 more horse power than 2002 Mazda Demio. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda Demio.

Because 2011 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda Demio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 429 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda Demio. (101 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda Demio. 2011 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 2002 Mazda Demio has manual transmission. 2002 Mazda Demio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: