2002 Mazda Laputa vs. 1969 Volkswagen 1600
To start off, 2002 Mazda Laputa is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Volkswagen 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Volkswagen 1600 would be higher. At 1,584 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Volkswagen 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda Laputa (52 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1969 Volkswagen 1600. (49 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda Laputa should accelerate faster than 1969 Volkswagen 1600.
Because 1969 Volkswagen 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Volkswagen 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda Laputa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda Laputa | 1969 Volkswagen 1600 | |
Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
Model | Laputa | 1600 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 40 L |