2002 Mazda Laputa vs. 1978 Volvo 164

To start off, 2002 Mazda Laputa is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2002 Mazda Laputa. (52 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda Laputa.

Because 1978 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda Laputa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Volvo 164 (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda Laputa. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1978 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda Laputa.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Mazda Laputa 1978 Volvo 164
Make Mazda Volvo
Model Laputa 164
Year Released 2002 1978
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 657 cc 2998 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 52 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 63 Nm 204 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 3400 mm 5610 mm
Vehicle Width 1480 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1550 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2370 mm 3350 mm