2002 Mazda Laputa vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda Laputa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda Laputa would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2002 Mazda Laputa. (52 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda Laputa.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda Laputa | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | Laputa | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2490 mm |