2002 Mazda Laputa vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda Laputa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda Laputa would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2002 Mazda Laputa. (52 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda Laputa.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda Laputa. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda Laputa.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda Laputa | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | Laputa | E-350 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 63 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 57 L |