2002 Mazda Laputa vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda Laputa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda Laputa would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2002 Mazda Laputa. (52 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda Laputa.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda Laputa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda Laputa. (63 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda Laputa.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda Laputa | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | Laputa | Colorado |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 63 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |