2002 Mazda Laputa vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda Laputa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda Laputa would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2002 Mazda Laputa. (52 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda Laputa.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda Laputa. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda Laputa.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda Laputa | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | Laputa | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 63 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 65 L |