2002 Mazda Laputa vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda Laputa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda Laputa would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 701 kg more than 2002 Mazda Laputa.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda Laputa. (63 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda Laputa.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mazda Laputa | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | Laputa | C30 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 63 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 60 L |
