2002 Mazda MPV vs. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 2002 Mazda MPV is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (180 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2002 Mazda MPV. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda MPV.
Because 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda MPV (310 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. (258 Nm). This means 2002 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda MPV | 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | MPV | 280 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 310 Nm | 258 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 86.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 78.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2410 mm |