2002 Mazda MPV vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2002 Mazda MPV. (139 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda MPV.
Because 2003 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mazda MPV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 2002 Mazda MPV has manual transmission. 2002 Mazda MPV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda MPV | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | MPV | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2490 mm |