2002 Mazda MPV vs. 2010 Scion tC
To start off, 2010 Scion tC is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Scion tC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Scion tC (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2002 Mazda MPV. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Scion tC should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda MPV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Scion tC (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda MPV. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Scion tC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mazda MPV | 2010 Scion tC | |
| Make | Mazda | Scion |
| Model | MPV | tC |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 219 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1415 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 55 L |
