2002 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1974 Mercury Comet

To start off, 2002 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,272 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1974 Mercury Comet. (83 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1974 Mercury Comet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1974 Mercury Comet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda RX-8 (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mercury Comet. (206 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2002 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mercury Comet.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Mazda RX-8 1974 Mercury Comet
Make Mazda Mercury
Model RX-8 Comet
Year Released 2002 1974
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2615 cc 3272 cc
Engine Type dual-disk rotary in-line
Horse Power 189 HP 83 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 206 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 1800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1390 kg 1220 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4620 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2630 mm