2002 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2002 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 2002 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 315 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda RX-8 (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (128 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2002 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda RX-8 | 1994 Rover 200 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | RX-8 | 200 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2615 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2510 mm |