2002 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2004 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2004 Mazda B2300 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 2002 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda RX-8 (238 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B2300. (135 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B2300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 28 kg more than 2002 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda RX-8 (211 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B2300. (206 Nm). This means 2002 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B2300.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda RX-8 | 2004 Mazda B2300 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | RX-8 | B2300 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 211 Nm | 206 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1338 kg | 1366 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 62 L |