2002 Mazda Tribute vs. 1941 Volvo PV

To start off, 2002 Mazda Tribute is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Volvo PV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Volvo PV would be higher. At 3,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1941 Volvo PV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda Tribute (195 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1941 Volvo PV. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1941 Volvo PV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 100 kg more than 1941 Volvo PV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1941 Volvo PV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mazda Tribute has automatic transmission and 1941 Volvo PV has manual transmission. 1941 Volvo PV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mazda Tribute will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: