2002 Mazda Tribute vs. 1976 Seat 133

To start off, 2002 Mazda Tribute is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Seat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Seat 133 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda Tribute (195 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1976 Seat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1976 Seat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 900 kg more than 1976 Seat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Seat 133. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda Tribute (270 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Seat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Seat 133.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Mazda Tribute 1976 Seat 133
Make Mazda Seat
Model Tribute 133
Year Released 2002 1976
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2967 cc 843 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 195 HP 34 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 270 Nm 54 Nm
Torque RPM 4750 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Vehicle Weight 1590 kg 690 kg
Vehicle Length 4400 mm 3460 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1430 mm
Vehicle Height 1720 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2030 mm