2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1941 Simca 5
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Simca 5 would be higher. At 599 cc (3 cylinders), 2002 MCC Crossblade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1941 Simca 5. (14 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1941 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 180 kg more than 1941 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 1941 Simca 5 | |
| Make | MCC | Simca |
| Model | Crossblade | 5 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1941 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 568 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 14 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 3220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1280 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2010 mm |
