2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1951 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Talbot Baby (108 HP) has 38 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Talbot Baby weights approximately 910 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 1951 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | MCC | Talbot |
| Model | Crossblade | Baby |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 3130 mm |
