2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1954 Plymouth Belvedere
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Plymouth Belvedere would be higher. At 3,960 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Plymouth Belvedere is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Plymouth Belvedere (156 HP) has 86 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Plymouth Belvedere should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Plymouth Belvedere weights approximately 800 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 1954 Plymouth Belvedere | |
Make | MCC | Plymouth |
Model | Crossblade | Belvedere |
Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2930 mm |