2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1960 TVR Grantura
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 TVR Grantura. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 TVR Grantura would be higher. At 997 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 TVR Grantura is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1960 TVR Grantura. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1960 TVR Grantura. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 80 kg more than 1960 TVR Grantura. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 102 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 1960 TVR Grantura | |
Make | MCC | TVR |
Model | Crossblade | Grantura |
Year Released | 2002 | 1960 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 38 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2140 mm |