2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1967 TVR Vixen
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 TVR Vixen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 TVR Vixen would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 TVR Vixen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 TVR Vixen (87 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 TVR Vixen should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 TVR Vixen weights approximately 50 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 TVR Vixen (125 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 1967 TVR Vixen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 1967 TVR Vixen | |
| Make | MCC | TVR |
| Model | Crossblade | Vixen |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 87 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2290 mm |
