2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1968 Mercedes-Benz 600

To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercedes-Benz 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercedes-Benz 600 would be higher. At 6,330 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Mercedes-Benz 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mercedes-Benz 600 (248 HP) has 178 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mercedes-Benz 600 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mercedes-Benz 600 weights approximately 2030 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mercedes-Benz 600 (500 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 398 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1968 Mercedes-Benz 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications:

2002 MCC Crossblade 1968 Mercedes-Benz 600
Make MCC Mercedes-Benz
Model Crossblade 600
Year Released 2002 1968
Engine Size 599 cc 6330 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 70 HP 248 HP
Torque 102 Nm 500 Nm
Torque RPM 3210 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 740 kg 2770 kg
Vehicle Length 2630 mm 6250 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1960 mm
Vehicle Height 1520 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 1810 mm 3910 mm