2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 would be higher. At 2,306 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 (118 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 weights approximately 610 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 (179 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 | |
| Make | MCC | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Crossblade | W 111 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 2306 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2760 mm |
