2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1970 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 599 cc (3 cylinders), 2002 MCC Crossblade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1970 Suzuki Fronte. (20 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1970 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 300 kg more than 1970 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Suzuki Fronte. (37 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 1970 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | MCC | Suzuki |
| Model | Crossblade | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1970 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 354 cc |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 20 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 37 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 1970 mm |
