2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL

To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL (168 HP) has 98 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 620 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL (240 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications:

2002 MCC Crossblade 1971 Mercedes-Benz SL
Make MCC Mercedes-Benz
Model Crossblade SL
Year Released 2002 1971
Engine Size 599 cc 2778 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 70 HP 168 HP
Torque 102 Nm 240 Nm
Torque RPM 3210 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 740 kg 1360 kg
Vehicle Length 2630 mm 4290 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1520 mm 1310 mm
Wheelbase Size 1810 mm 2410 mm