2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1972 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 599 cc (3 cylinders), 2002 MCC Crossblade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2002 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
Make | MCC | Suzuki |
Model | Crossblade | LJ 20 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 27 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 37 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |