2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1974 ZIL 117
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 ZIL 117. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 ZIL 117 would be higher. At 6,957 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 ZIL 117 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 ZIL 117 (296 HP) has 226 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 ZIL 117 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 ZIL 117 weights approximately 2210 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 ZIL 117 (570 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 468 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1974 ZIL 117 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 1974 ZIL 117 | |
Make | MCC | ZIL |
Model | Crossblade | 117 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1974 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 6957 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 296 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 570 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 2950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 3310 mm |