2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1979 Triumph Dolomite
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Triumph Dolomite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Triumph Dolomite would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Triumph Dolomite is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1979 Triumph Dolomite. (57 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1979 Triumph Dolomite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Triumph Dolomite weights approximately 200 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Triumph Dolomite. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Triumph Dolomite.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 1979 Triumph Dolomite | |
| Make | MCC | Triumph |
| Model | Crossblade | Dolomite |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 57 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2460 mm |
