2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1980 Renault 20
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Renault 20 would be higher. At 1,647 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Renault 20 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Renault 20 weights approximately 448 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 1980 Renault 20 | |
Make | MCC | Renault |
Model | Crossblade | 20 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1647 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1188 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2670 mm |