2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1980 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 845 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Renault Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 60 kg more than 1980 Renault Rodeo.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 1980 Renault Rodeo | |
Make | MCC | Renault |
Model | Crossblade | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2002 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2410 mm |